Must See JV!
Sunday, November 30, 2008

Venus, Jupiter and the moon align this weekend

After Thanksgiving, you may be so stuffed you can do nothing but sit and stare up at the sky.

Well that’s the perfect position to take when Venus, Jupiter and a crescent moon line up in the southwestern sky just after sunset on Nov. 30th and Dec. 1st.

No need for a telescope. The Moon and the two planets will be visible to the unaided eye and easily distinguishable from the stars in the distance.

“They will be the brightest things in the sky,” said Anthony Cook, astronomical observer at the Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles.

The three celestial objects pass each other once a year but rarely do they appear this clearly, he said.

“It’s striking,” Cook added.

Here’s the scoop: Look to the southwest, about 17 degrees above the horizon, between 6 and 7:30 p.m. on either night.

On Nov. 30, the crescent moon will be just below the two planets. Venus will be the brightest of the two and Jupiter will have a slight yellow tinge. On Dec. 1, the moon will be just above the two planets.

To see photos of similar alignments from the past, check out the NASA Images website.

Cook doesn’t recommend looking through a telescope because you won’t be able to get all three objects in one field. Instead, he suggests using less-powerful binoculars to see some detail without isolating any of the orbs.

Although the moon and the planes will look close in the sky, they are actually millions of miles apart. The moon is 240,000 miles away; Venus is 93 million miles away and Jupiter is a scant 539 million miles from earth.

You can read more about the alignment and other astronomical sights on the Griffith Observatory’s weekly Sky Report.

-Hugo Martín, Times Staff Writer

[Photo: Venus, Jupiter and the Moon align over Phoenix. Credit T. Polakis, courtesy of NASA]


Source: LA Times

Still Not Convinced to Recycle More?
Tuesday, November 25, 2008


If you ever get too lazy to recycle, or you need help convincing people to recycle, read this!

Plastic Producers WANT you to recycle. They complain about not getting enough used plastic products to remanufacture, because of all the energy it takes to use virgin plastic (polythene).

here's why:

~Plastic production uses 8% of the world's oil production!

~Nearly 1.8 tons of oil are SAVED for every ton of RECYCLED polythene produced.

~Recycling a single plastic bottle can conserve enough energy to light a 60W bulb for up to 6 hours.
~If every American household recycled just ONE out of every ten discarded HDPE bottles (used in milk jugs and most shampoo and detergent bottles), it would keep 200,000,000 pounds of plastic OUT of landfills.

~A report on the production of plastic grocery carrier bags concluded that the use of recycled plastic resulted in:
• reduction of energy consumption by 67%
• reduction of water usage by nearly 90%
• reduction of carbon dioxide generation by 87%

How about paper?
~Making a ton of paper from virgin wood requires
• 3,688 pounds of wood • 24,000 gallons of water

~Each ton of recycled paper saves
• 17 35-foot trees, which could make 11,500 pages of 20-pound 8.5” x 11” paper
• 380 gallons of oil, or enough to run the average car for 1,260 miles
• 3.1 cubic yards of landfill space
• 4,077 kilowatts of energy, or enough to heat and air condition an average American home
for six months

WOW! Doesn't that make you want to recycle? Let's reduce the load of garbage that is going to our landfills. It's easy! Just keep a container in your kitchen along with your trash can to separate your recyclables from your garbage, and even keep one in your bedroom (I do). Throw the recyclables into your recycle bin each week, instead of the garbage bin.
With paper, its ok to use the back side of each page, even for homework assignments. Buy recycled paper items at the store. They are affordable!

~drf.umd.edu

Green Building

Green efforts embrace poor; More areas are updating housing to cut energy use and utility bills
Haya El Nasser

Low-income people who live in old or flimsy housing are becoming prime targets for cities and groups intent on slashing energy use.
Recent efforts to cut energy consumption in the home have focused on new construction, often in more affluent areas and public buildings. Now, community organizations and cities that have embraced the green effort are homing in on low-income houses and apartments to reduce emissions and help poor people lower their utility bills.
"That area is getting a lot more attention now," says Tom Deyo, senior adviser for Green Strategies at NeighborWorks America, a non-profit that promotes homeownership and affordable housing through more than 230 local organizations.
It launched a website this month designed to help create greener and healthier housing and neighborhoods.
In several cities, public and private funds and services are teaming to give low-income households free energy audits, compact fluorescent (CF) light bulbs, insulation and other energy-saving devices and tips:
  • On Oct. 1, groups working with Greenprint Denver -- Mayor John Hickenlooper's climate initiative -- went door-to-door through the low-income Sunnyside neighborhood.
"We looked at utility data and found it was the highest energy-using neighborhood with the lowest income," says Michele Moss Weingarden, Greenprint director. The homes are older and poor residents or seniors on fixed incomes can't always afford the insulation and appliance upgrades available, she says.
The Neighborhood Energy Blitz gave the residents energy audits, got them to sign up for the city's free recycling service, offered a tree to plant in their backyards, replaced light bulbs and shower heads and inspected furnaces and water heaters.
  • Rays of Hope Austin, a non-profit founded by local interior designer Effie Brunson, offers low-income homeowners solar panels. Before they're installed, volunteers upgrade light bulbs, insulation and appliances.
Homeowners in the Texas capital get a utility rebate from Austin Energy. Water and electricity usage can be cut by 40% to 50%.
  • The Sustainability Institute in North Charleston, S.C., a non-profit, has helped 1,300-plus homeowners lower energy bills by 10% to 25%.
"Most of the homes have upwards of $300 or more a month in energy bills," says Renee Patey, program manager. "We choose homes that are bad, where the building envelope is very leaky, that get air infiltration, heat and energy loss."

Low-income areas key

Rosetta Martinez had seen those funny-shaped light bulbs in stores and knew they used less energy but at $9 apiece couldn't afford them.
So when volunteers offered a floor-to-ceiling energy audit of her two-bedroom Denver home, throwing in CF bulbs, a programmable thermostat and insulation around doors, windows, the water heater and furnace, she was ecstatic.
"I was all into saving energy," says Martinez, 53, a security guard who bought her home three years ago. "But I'm single and I'm barely making it."
Greenprint Denver found that 52% of the carbon emissions generated in Denver come from the way homes and businesses use energy (another 30% from transportation).
City officials also know that reaching lower-income households is a key to reducing energy use.
"Eighty percent of the housing stock was built before 1970, and much of that is in lower-income neighborhoods," says Mayor Hickenlooper, one of the first to sign the U.S. Conference of Mayors' Climate Protection Agreement. He set a goal of reducing per-capita greenhouse gas emissions 10% by 2012 and 25% by 2020.

A citywide effort

Hickenlooper launched Greenprint Denver with the help of 33 civic, government and business leaders. It encourages residents to take shorter showers, install CF bulbs, ride a bike or walk one day a week, plant a tree and use reusable bags. The city is working with real estate boards to do energy audits every time a house is sold.
"There is synergy in being able to put more money in the savings accounts of low-income families and do that through reducing energy," Hickenlooper says.
Greenprint mobilized organizations and companies to perform the services. The Mile High Youth Corps, for example, installed low-flow toilets in low-income houses.
"Energy costs are volatile, and we wanted to help people stay warm this winter," Weingarden says. "For this community, we knew we could have a huge impact and we wanted to make it as easy as possible."
Marlene Vasquez, 53, moved to a three-bedroom rental home in Sunnyside last summer. She's on government assistance and takes care of six grandchildren, ages 2-14.
Less than two months ago, she says, "somebody came to my door and brought me one light bulb and talked to me about energy." Then she got an energy audit, a new furnace with a digital thermostat and energy-saving bulbs. Volunteers have helped her lower her water usage.
Vasquez is excited to see how much these measures will knock off her $120-a-month energy bill. "I'm hoping for at least $30 a month," she says.

Copyright 2008 Gannett Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved - Source.

Labels: , , , ,

Oil Prices Need to Go Back Up!
Sunday, November 23, 2008

As oil prices fall, we are less likely to push for green-tech. With the price for regular unleaded at just under $2/gallon, I am torn between celebrating at the pump and cringing because of what it means for alternative energy. And according to this article, oil is expected to continue falling.

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Oil prices could fall to as low as $40 a barrel next year as more efficient refining capacity comes online and production costs for some regions fall, Deutsche Bank said in a Wednesday research note.

"The most underappreciated issue is the combination of poor demand with major new refining capacity additions and the extent to which that will undermine light sweet crude prices," the bank said in the note outlining the downside risk to its 2009 oil forecast.

"We believe that cash production cost 'floors' for the oil price are shrinking target (lower costs, stronger U.S. dollar), which imply a 'V' shaped downside to $40 a barrel crude around April 2009."

Oil prices have tumbled from a record over $147 a barrel to below $54 a barrel on Wednesday as demand from large consumer nations across the globe wilts due to the economic crisis.

The bank said the new refining capacity additions will use 20 percent less crude to make gasoline and distillate than older capacity, cutting the need for crude and pressuring prices.

In addition, the research note said healthy supply increases from non-OPEC sources should also weigh on oil.

"Given the weak demand we see versus relatively healthy supply levels, we seek the cash break-even cost of marginal production as the floor for oil prices," Deutsche Bank analyst Paul Sankey wrote, adding this floor was a "shrinking target".

"As oil falls, costs fall, the U.S. dollar strengthens, further causing local (Canadian, Russian) break-evens to fall."

OPEC members, feeling the squeeze of falling oil prices, will also face increased pressure not to cut production due to shrinking revenues, the bank said.

Source: Reuters

ZeroWater Filter With Almost Zero Waste
Saturday, November 22, 2008


ZeroWater Filter with Almost Zero Waste

by Mary Logan Barmeyer


We've heard again and again that it's time to kick the plastic water bottle habit and head back to the tap. Despite evidence that our tap water is highly regulated and just as safe as bottled, news about pharmaceuticals and chemicals in drinking water or pipes that may contain lead, or even just bad tasting tap, can make us wary of getting our water straight from the faucet. Although most water filters can't eliminate every contaminant, they can help reduce them. But are unrecyclable water filters any better for the environment than recyclable plastic bottles? Not if you can recycle them.
Zero Technologies recently launched a recycling program for filters, the only program of its kind in the country. Ninety percent of the materials in its ZeroWater filters are recyclable--even the filter media are recycled for use in wastewater-treatment plants--and they can be shipped back to the company in their original packaging in exchange for a discount on replacements. (Zero is also one of the only companies to offer filter bottles made of glass, although the ABS plastic used in their other products has been tested to ensure no chemicals leach out).
ZeroWater's carbon and ion-exchange filter reduces dissolved solids in water down to zero parts per million, which you can test with a total dissolved solids (TDS) meter that comes with the filter. The filters are also NSF certified to remove lead, chlorine taste and odor, mercury, hydrogen sulfide, chromium, aluminum, zinc and iron.
But remember, you may not need a water filter at all. Your annual Consumer Confidence Report, which you can get through your water supplier, will tell you about local water quality, and if you're worried about lead in your pipes, check with your health department or contact a specialist to test your household water.
ZeroWater filters are available online at http://www.zerowater.com/. Half-gallon pitchers are $39.99, and larger 2.5 gallon bottles are $119.99 for glass or $99.99 for plastic.

California leads fight against climate change on global level


California formally moved to spread its can-do global warming gospel around the world, signing a declaration Wednesday with 11 other U.S. states and provinces or states in five other countries to help them slash their greenhouse gas emissions.

Fighting climate change shouldn't just go "nation by nation," Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger told a climate summit in Beverly Hills attended by more than 700 delegates from 19 countries. It must go "province by province. . . . We have got to do something worldwide here," he said.

California's unusual state-level diplomacy comes as President-elect Barack Obama has pledged to invigorate U.S. participation in negotiations for a successor to the Kyoto Protocol, which took effect in 2005 -- and which the Bush administration declined to join.

Talks on a new climate treaty resume in Poland next month, and final agreement is expected to be signed in Copenhagen in December 2009. But success is far from assured as industrial nations, which have caused much of the world's global warming, battle with fast-growing developing nations such as China to determine who should cut emissions.

Regional leaders signing Wednesday's declaration said they would develop strategies for high-polluting industries in an effort to influence the talks. The signers included 12 U.S. governors and state or provincial representatives from Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Indonesia and India.

California has developed more technical expertise in controlling planet-heating emissions than any U.S. state in the two years since it passed a law requiring its emissions to fall by about 15% in the next 12 years. And although the federal government has stalled in adopting any economy-wide climate legislation, the Golden State has forged ahead with renewable energy standards, automobile tailpipe regulations, efficiency incentives and forest carbon protocols.

"California is a little spot on the globe, but the influence we have on the rest of the world is enormous," Schwarzenegger told the conference, touting the "green jobs" that the state would produce from solar and other clean-technology energy.

The declaration sets in motion a process for the state's Air Resources Board, one of the world's oldest and most sophisticated pollution control agencies, to share engineering and policy expertise with regions such as Brazil's Amazon states and Indonesia's forested provinces on how to measure and control greenhouse gases.

China, India, Brazil and other fast-developing nations have resisted caps on their emissions.

"The industrial countries that have been spewing out the most greenhouse gases have a higher responsibility to act," said Gov. Ana Julia de Vasconcelos Carpa of the Brazilian state of Para.

About 20% of the world's annual carbon emissions come from burning forests in Brazil, Indonesia and other tropical nations. In an international carbon market, as envisioned in California's global warming law, U.S. industries could pay to preserve tropical forest as a cheaper way to meet their own global warming targets. It is a source of income that foreign leaders are eager to tap.

Gov. Jim Doyle of Wisconsin, one of the signers of the agreement, said that his heavily forested state also would share research with the tropical nations. "We have a joint interest in how the carbon market moves forward," he said. "We want to ensure that forest lands and their facility in capturing carbon receive appropriate credit. This will be a big political fight in this country and around the world."

Tropical deforestation, which was excluded from the emissions rules in the Kyoto Protocol, is expected to be incorporated in the new treaty. But how the developing nations are compensated by wealthy nations for not burning down their forests is far from resolved.

With California and other U.S. states facing severe fiscal restraints as the economy worsens, nonprofit organizations including the Climate Group, Conservation International and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation have pledged funds to support working groups and draft position papers for states and provinces that signed Wednesday's pact.

"Everyone wishes they could just say, 'I'm going to protect my forest, so give me money,' " said Peter Seligmann, chief executive of Conservation International. "But we have to verify that any commodity is real. Now these regions are linking with California, the eighth largest economy in the world, in an effort to create a verifiable source of carbon credits. That is huge."

Source: Margot Roosevelt, LA Times

Baby Green Bean -- The Crack Down on Fat
Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Mmm, chocolate chip cookies, brownies, cakes... Those warm fuzzy memories of munching down 50 cent portions on the school playground are a thing of the past, quite literally.

To combat the epidemic of childhood obesity, new state nutrition guidelines strictly limit the fat, sugar and total calories of any food sold on campus during school days - even before and after school.

This has led to the ban of not only selling greasy foods at lunchtime, as well as the disappearance of soda and junk food vending machines from public school campuses across the state. Lunch options are now including spinach salad, healthy burritos and grilled chicken.

But the real shocker comes with the banning of bake sales from all campuses. The home-baked delectables that for many years has symbolized the hard raised funds of loving parents has come to an end. The low-nutrition and highly refined sugary treats are no longer allowed to be sold on campuses. So what are classes to do to raise funds for their projects? Well, this will certainly push for alternative fundraisers such as walk-a-thons, auctions, etc. Hopefully we will see a lower trend in childhood obesity in the coming years.


Source:
http://www.thedailygreen.com/cm/thedailygreen/images/8e/child-obesity-donut-md.jpg

Pollute, baby, pollute


George Bush is working at a breakneck pace to dismantle at least 10 major environmental safeguards protecting America's wildlife, national parks and rivers before he leaves office in January.

With barely 60 days to go until Bush hands over to Barack Obama, his White House is working methodically to weaken or reverse an array of regulations that protect America's wilderness from logging or mining operations, and compel factory farms to clean up dangerous waste.

In the latest such move this week, Bush opened up some 800,000 hectares (2m acres) of land in Rocky Mountain states for the development of oil shale, one of the dirtiest fuels on the planet. The law goes into effect on January 17, three days before Obama takes office.

The timing is crucial. Most regulations take effect 60 days after publication, and Bush wants the new rules in place before he leaves the White House on January 20. That will make it more difficult for Obama to undo them.

The last-minute rules passed during the "midnight hours" of the George Bush presidency differ from his predecessors because they are basically a project of deregulation - not regulation. Among the most far-reaching:

• Industrial-size pig, cow and chicken farms can disregard the Clean Water Act and air pollution controls.

• The interior department can approve development such as mining or logging without consulting wildlife managers about their impact.

• Restrictions will be eased so power plants can operate near national parks and wilderness areas.

• Pollution controls on new power plants will be downgraded.

• Mountain-top mine operators could dump waste into rivers and streams.

• 2m acres of land in Utah, Wyoming and Colorado opened to development of oil shales, the dirtiest fuel on Earth.


Read the rest here.


Source: The Guardian

Cloned Animals on the Dinner Plate?
Tuesday, November 18, 2008


In early 2008, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that they considered meat and milk from cloned animals to be safe to eat1 despite years of controversy and a long list of unresolved ethical, health, and animal welfare concerns. The agency asked the livestock industry to continue a voluntary moratorium on putting meat and milk from cloned animals into the food supply, but did not ask for the same moratorium on products from the offspring of cloned animals. And, to add insult to injury, the agency will not require any of these foods to be labeled.

Currently, the appeal of cloned animals to the livestock industry largely lies in their role as breeders or milk producers. Already, cloned bulls’ sperm is shipped all over the country to sire offspring with particularly desirable traits, such as high milk production. These “half-clones” (offspring of cloned animals) are possibly reaching the marketplace, with no consumer awareness as to their ancestry. One semen broker who has sold the sperm of cloned bulls, said that these offspring are “going to be slaughtered [for food], and the FDA can’t do anything about it.” In 2001, the FDA asked farmers to voluntarily refrain from selling meat or milk from cloned animals or their offspring, but no one at the agency is tracking whether farmers are complying.2

In 1998, cows were successfully cloned for the first time in Japan. Approximately 300 beef cows, 150 dairy cows, and 200 pigs have been cloned in the United States.3 A Texas-based company began cloning champion horses in March 2006, which can sell for as much as $150,000 per horse.4 And pet cats can be cloned by a private company for $32,000.5

Pushing ahead with cloning animals for food, researchers have cloned pigs whose meat contains higher levels of omega-3 fatty acids by blending a gene from earthworms with pig’s genetic material. No one has tasted the transgenic piglets’ meat, yet. Nevertheless, scientists hope to clone chickens and cows with high levels of omeegs-3s in the future.6 Even as the FDA is poised to approve cloned animals for human consumption, there are concerns about the process’ impact on animal health and the insufficient research on eating meat or drinking milk from cloned animals.Link

Fact Sheet: Cloned Animals on the Dinner Plate?

Read on.

Take Action!

Source: courtesy of foodandwaterwatch.org.


Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

LA/OC Fires
Saturday, November 15, 2008

If you live in Southern California, you can't help but notice the horrible air quality we are suffering today as a result of the fires in the Los Angeles and Orange County areas. I pray that those whose homes are being threatened with the flames are safe insha'Allah.

Here are some tips on staying safe and healthy as the winds blow the fires and their ashes all over.
  • Don't try to be a hero, if you are told to evacuate, please do so.
  • If you have Asthma or any other respiratory illness, keep your inhaler handy and try to stay indoors.
  • If you must be outdoors and the air quality is bad, cover your mouth and nose with a cloth or mask to help keep the particles of ash out of your respiratory tract as much as possible.
  • If you're driving, keep the windows up and have the internal air circulation button on, so that ashes and other particles are not circulating in your car as you drive.
  • If you are having difficulty breathing and you already have a pre-existing condition its important that you seek medical attention.
  • Stay well-hydrated.
  • And, of course, make dua for the rain.

‘O Allah, send upon us helpful, wholesome and healthy rain, beneficial not harmful rain, now, not later.’

Stay updated with the fires here.

Labels: , , ,

Proposition 2 Protects Animal Rights
Friday, November 14, 2008

By Jennifer Das Faias

The 2008 election made history in more ways than one. California
voters passed Proposition 2, the Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty
Act.

Proposition 2 will amend the lives of millions of farm animals, (like the chickens on the right)
confined in small crates and cages where they can hardly move for
essentially their entire lives.

The purpose of this act is to outlaw the cruel and inhumane
confinement of animals which applies to breeding pigs, egg laying hens
and veal calves.

By January of 2015, California farms are obligated to provide enough
space for animals to stand up, turn around and extend their limbs. For
animals, this means they no longer have to live and suffer in
miserable conditions.

For Californians, this means improved health and food safety. Filthy,
unkempt, unsafe and crammed cages are breeding grounds for diseases
such as Salmonella, which can be passed on to consumers.

Proposition 2 also supports Californian family farmers and, protects
air and water and safeguards the environment.

Fisher student Ashley Grinnell is an animal lover of all kinds.

"I hope New York follows in California's footsteps. It's so sad to
think these animals treated as objects," Grinnell said.

The Rochester area is also taking strides to protect animals. Last
month, Monroe County Legislators sent a memorializing referral to
local grocers and food markets to stop selling eggs from hens in
battery cages.

Rochester animal rights activist, Adam Durand, is the campaign
director for Animal Rights International. (ARI). ARI seeks to reduce
animal suffering of all kinds; refining agricultural methods is one
effort.

Durand, supporter of Proposition 2, says this referral is a big step
to abolish the use of battery cages.

"Whole foods, college campuses and universities, including the
University of Rochester, have ended or greatly reduced their use of
caged hens," Durand said.

In 2004, Adam Durand and two other investigators documented the
appalling animal cruelty taking place at New York State's largest egg
farm, Wegmans Egg Farm, which supplies the Wegmans grocery store
chain.

They found hens living in disgusting conditions. Many were covered in
feces and many were dead due to not having access to food or water.

Up to nine hens were stuffed in cages the size of file drawers and
many had painful infections due to their skin and feathers rubbing
against the rough wire.

In December of 2005, St. John Fisher held a screening of the
documentary "Wegmans Cruelty." This documentary raised a lot of
attention locally and nationally. Durand was arrested for trespassing
and spent a month in jail. In 2007, Wegmans sold its egg farm.

"Most likely, Wegmans continues to sell battery caged eggs," Durand
said.

St. John Fisher student Melissa Dempsey followed Proposition 2.

"I am really happy it passed. I saw Oprah's show about Prop 2. I had
heard about farm cruelty but to witness it on this show was eye-
opening," Dempsey said. "Seeing cage-free hens on an organic farm and
then the farm with hens stuffed in cages where they could barely move,
was enough for me. I now only purchase eggs that are cage-free."

There are people who care where their meat and dairy products come
from, those who don't know, or those who just don't care.
Fisher student Jake Andrews was not aware of Proposition 2 and thinks
other issues are more important.

"Animals like pigs and chickens were put on this earth to be consumed.
I don't think it matters how they are raised, they are going to die or
be killed anyway," Andrews said.

Reference: Cardinal Courier Online
Image: http://www.indybay.org/uploads/2007/07/24/egg3.jpg

Dare to Prepare…
Thursday, November 13, 2008

SubhanAllah… according to a report by the U.S. Geological Survey, Southern California Earthquake Center and California Geological Survey the state of California faces a 99.7 percent chance of being rocked by a Northridge-size earthquake by 2037.

Researchers found the odds of such an event are higher in Southern California than Northern California, 97 percent versus 93 percent chance.

The study focuses on specific fault lines and urbanized areas, as well as making predictions about whole regions. On balance, we as southern Californians should be a little more nervous than those in the north; the probabilities for quakes of magnitude at least 7.5 before 2037 are 37% in the south versus 15% in the north.

The last time a magnitude 6.7 quake hit California was the 1994 Northridge disaster, which killed 72 people, injured more than 9,000 and caused $25 billion in damage.

“We look at the very largest earthquakes, magnitude 7.5 and greater, the odds of one of those happening within the San Francisco Bay region in the next 30 years is 10 percent,” said U.S.G.S. seismologist Tom Parsons.

~~~
=> This information makes you want to reflect on Surah 99 - The Earthquake.

Baby Green Bean -- Elephant Art
Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Here is a beautiful example of the intelligence, sophistication, and sheer beauty of a creation of Allah (swt). This is almost unbelievable!



Also, visit the Elephant Gallery to see more...

sign here to protect organic fish
Tuesday, November 11, 2008

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/813124154?z00m=17779912

Going Green the Economical Way :)
Monday, November 10, 2008

http://www.care2.com/greenliving/save-money-going-green-care2s-best-ideas.html

Testing ... One, Two, Three
Sunday, November 09, 2008




Sign the Pledge Against Animal Testing

Animal News
Saturday, November 08, 2008


Here are some main headlines I came across in the news this week:

  • This past Tuesday 2/3 of Californians voted in favor of increasing farm animal space giving them free mobility. Farmers have been given till January 2015 to change their animal housing situation and get rid of all battery cages.
  • Cheetahs are being reintroduced into South Africa's Mountain Zebra National Park.
  • In Kenya, elephants are given a new high-tech collar that sends text messages when they cross a virtual fence. This allows the rangers to rush to the elephant's site and protect both crops and the elephant.
  • Warmer temperatures due to climate changes are adversely affecting lemmings mainly in Norway, the Arctic region and Canada. The warmth causes wetter snow. This prevents them from burying food and burrowing into the snow to hide from predators.
  • eBay will ban all black market sales of ivory by Jan 2009. This was declared just before the International Fund for Animal Welfare declared that in a 6-week period over 7,000 posts were made selling body parts of protected wildlife.
Click here to see the best wild animal photos for 2008.

Cloned animals meet early deaths
Thursday, November 06, 2008

Cloned animals may indeed die young suggests the first direct study of their lifespan, carried out by Japanese researchers on mice.

Cloning involves removing the nucleus from an egg and replacing it with the nucleus of a donor cell. Many of these "nuclear transfer" embryos never develop or miscarry. Even after birth some clones die. But many cloning scientists argue that the few survivors can be perfectly normal.

Atsuo Ogura of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases in Tokyo says his team's work suggests that some effects of cloning are not apparent in the days, weeks or even years after birth. "It is very probable that, at least for some populations of clones, some unpredictable defects will appear in the long run," he says.

The debate over the health of clones and how they age has swung one way and then the other. In November 2001, US biotech company Advanced Cell Technology reported the cloning of two dozen apparently healthy cloned cows. But in January, the first mammal cloned from an adult cell, Dolly the sheep, was reported to have prematurely developed arthritis.

Rudolf Jaenisch, a mouse cloner at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Boston says the new work "shows that to look at animals at one point in time and say they are healthy and normal is really wishful thinking."

Immune system defect

Ogura's team cloned 12 male mice and these were compared with seven males from natural matings and six others produced using in vitro fertilisation. The clones appeared active and healthy, gained weight normally and matched the control animals in 14 of 16 physiological measurements.

But the first cloned animal died after only 311 days and, by day 800, 10 (83 per cent) of the animals were dead. In contrast, only three (23 per cent) of the controls died during the same period.

The dead clones showed high rates of pneumonia, liver disease, cancer and a lower level of antibody production, suggesting they had an immune system defect. Ogura's team is now trying to pinpoint the precise cause of death and repeat the experiment with more animals.

ACT's Tony Perry points out that it remains unclear if clones from other species such as cows or pigs die early. And even if clones in general do prove to have a shortened lifespan, he does not think that undermines data from ACT and others that clones can be healthy.

All the researchers agree that the work should be an additional warning to would-be human cloners.

Reference

2002. Cohen, Philip. Nature Genetics. 10: 1038.

Labels: ,

Baby Green Bean -- Love the Little Critters


One of the beautiful attributes of Allah (swt) is Mercy. We should remember the hadith which tells us that when Allah (swt) created Mercy, He divided it into one hundred portions. He kept ninety-nine portions for Himself and distributed the last portion among His creation. All the Mercy and Compassion we see in this world and all the Mercy that is exercised by every species of creatures anywhere in the universe is part of that last share.

The Prophet (pbuh) says that "Even when an animal lifts its leg to allow its youngsters to pass" it does so as a result of having a share of that last portion of mercy which Allah has distributed among all His creatures.

Our children have grown up (and we have, too) these days with little to no appreciation of the natural world. We prefer to keep them inside tied to electronic devices that give responses to pushing buttons.

What can a child learn of the beauty of Allah's (swt) creation when we cannot see it or experience it? Where is the most wonderful place to see such Mercy before our very eyes? That's inexpensive, and nearby? Well, besides preserved lands, (if you're lucky to live near one) the ZOO!

Taking my 15-month-old has proven to be a most rewarding experience to teach her about other creatures. Parents can illustrate love, mercy and care towards animals. And one of the best things about a zoo, is that you can "adopt" an animal! You can sponsor the care of an animal in the zoo, and that can teach your child that he/she is a part of the care for an animal. By adopting an animal you support the health, well-being, and maintenance of an animal.

These small steps can be taken to assure that our children will grow to love and appreciate Allah's (swt) creation, and learn to make choices that will positively affect their planet.

Sources:
http://www.islamicvoice.com/may.97/hadith.htm
www.santaanazoo.org

Animal Week: Animal Rights - An Islamic Perspective
Tuesday, November 04, 2008

By V.A. Mohamad Ashrof
Activist and Writer - India

We live in a world inhabited not only by humans but also by countless other creatures that share the world with us. Animals provide resources and services that we use. They form part of the life-support system of the earth on which all life depends. Every kind of thing is produced on the earth in due balance and measure. The mineral kingdom supports the vegetable, which in turn support the animal kingdom, and there is a link of mutual dependence between them, in a chain of gradation and interdependence. This ecological and organic vision of the world is amply described by the Qur’an: [The earth We have spread out (like a carpet); set thereon mountains firm and immovable: and produced therein all kinds of things in due balance] (Al-Hijr 15:19).

What should be our relationship with creatures in the animal world? The Islamic view of human relation with animals cannot be evaluated in isolation from its tawheedi worldview. Islam inculcates a faith in the Eternal, Transcendental Creator, Who created according to a plan and purpose. From the smallest particle to the large galaxies, all the flora and fauna fulfill their assigned role in a unified divine scheme: [Do you not see that God is He, Whom obeys whoever is in the heavens and whoever is in the earth, and the sun and the moon and the stars, and the mountains and the trees, and the animals and many of the people] (Al-Hajj 22:18).


We see that each animal has been created with a specific purpose, either to benefit human beings directly, or as symbols for people to ponder over God’s greatness (An-Nahl 16:5,8, An-Naziat 79; An-Noor 24:45). The existence of animals is proof for the very existence of God (An-Noor 24:45). Even animals’ geographical distribution is ordained by God (Al-Jathiya 45:4, 29). Any beholder can see the simple homely things of life in which human beings receive so many benefits from divine mercy (Ya-Seen 36:71-73). The Qur’an invites man to contemplate the cattle, sheep, horses, camels, mules, and other domestic animals, the birds of the sky, and all the innumerable species and genera that they comprise (Al-Ghashiya 88:17; Ya-Seen 36:71; and An-Noor 24:41). The way in which the birds fly and stay in the air is a sign of God in which there is guidance for humankind (Al-Insan 67:19; An-Nahl 16:79). God established and maintained a balance between all His creations (Ar-Rahman 55:7-10). God alone is the real Sustainer and Provider. He has taken upon Himself the responsibility to provide for every living creature (Hud 11:6; Adh-Dhariyat 51:58; Al-Hijr 15:19-21; Al-`Ankaboot 29:60).

By creating right instincts, God has bestowed a balanced chain so that food is available for everyone. Terrible consequences will follow if this chain is broken (Ar-Rahman 55:8; Ar-Room 30:41). By over-killing and destroying, man has exterminated magnificent creatures in the wild. He has almost wiped out whales in the northern hemisphere and is continuing in the other. Widespread beating, kicking, overriding, torturing, cruel slaughtering methods and vivisection, causing animal pain and suffering have created an enlightened demand for more humane ethics. Philosopher Charles Hartshorne expressed the need thus: “We need new ethical and practical ideas to mediate between ultimate ideas and our concrete situation.”1


The Islamic worldview and guidelines give sufficient basis for a humane treatment of animals. If one compares Islam with other worldviews, one can see different approaches to such concepts. For example, a pantheistic worldview of reality will have problems in fighting against pain, cruelty, and injustice since, ultimately, these things are only part of the reality that is “god” in the pantheistic sense. One major objective of Islam is that it seeks to make the human being kind hearted towards fellow creatures. Kindness is an important ingredient of the human conscience. God Himself is compassionate and kind and wants man, His vicegerent on earth, to be kindhearted towards all living creatures.

Read on:

~~~

Aḥādīth
- extracted from article.


Narated By Anas bin Malik: The Prophet said,
"If any Muslim plants any plant and a human being or an animal eats of it, he will be rewarded as if he had given that much in charity."[Bukhari Vol. 8, Book 73, #41]


Narated By Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle said, "While a man was walking on a road. he became very thirsty. Then he came across a well, got down into it, drank (of its water) and then came out. Meanwhile he saw a dog panting and licking mud because of excessive thirst. The man said to himself "This dog is suffering from the same state of thirst as I did." So he went down the well (again) and filled his shoe (with water) and held it in his mouth and watered the dog. Allah thanked him for that deed and forgave him." The people asked, "O Allah's Apostle! Is there a reward for us in serving the animals?" He said, "(Yes) There is a reward for serving any animate (living being)."[Bukhari Vol. 8, Book 73, #38] & [Muslim Book 26, Chapter 39, # 5577]


Narated By Salim: That Ibn 'Umar disliked the branding of animals on the face. Ibn 'Umar said, "The Prophet forbade beating (animals) on the face."[Bukhari Vol.7, Book 67, #449] & [Muslim Book 24, Chapter 21, #5281]

Narated By Ibn ‘Umar: The Prophet cursed the one who did Muthla to an animal (i e., cut its limbs or some other part of its body while it is still alive). – [Bukhari Vol. 7, Book 67, #424]

Narated By Hisham bin Zaid: Anas and I went to Al-Hakam bin Aiyub. Anas saw some boys shooting at a tied hen. Anas said, "The Prophet has forbidden the shooting of tied or confined animals." – [Bukhari Vol. 7, Book 67, #421; #422]

Narated By 'Abdullah bin 'Umar : Allah's Apostle said, "A lady was punished because of a cat which she had imprisoned till it died. She entered the (Hell) Fire because of it, for she neither gave it food nor water as she had imprisoned it, nor set it free to eat from the vermin of the earth." [Bukhari Vol.4, Book 56, #689]

~~~



More Information:

Labels: , , , , , ,

Green Animals. Green Zabiha.
Monday, November 03, 2008

I recently read an article by Green Zabiha caught my eye. I'm sure we've all heard these arguments before but I think it is really worth while to look into this article and read it through very well. It is very well organized indeed and an excellent reminder as to what goes into the "food" we eat!

Furthermore, to realize that they are also Allah (swt)'s creations that need to be treated with dignity and kindness as was shown by our beloved Prophet Muhammad (saws).

Here are a few pieces from the article that caught my attention:
  • The government allows cow feed to include
  1. pork(!)
  2. cow fat (!)
  3. blood (!)
  4. poultry and
  5. horse to name a few things
  • chicken feed includes an arsenic-based additive called Roxarsone, which is used to ‘to promote growth, kill parasites and improve pigmentation of chicken meat.’. What is interesting is that studies have found that the bacteria found in chicken litter (which is fed to cows) makes the arsenic more toxic, and if the chicken litter is used as fertilizer, it has even shown up in streams and areas with large chicken factories have shown higher levels of rare cancers.
  • They die from the stunning: As described by Temple Grandin who audits slaughter for McDonalds, and is perhaps the world renowned designer of livestock handling facilities and a Professor of Animal Science at Colorado State University: “The stunner has a pneumatic-powered ‘gun’ that fires a steel bolt about seven inches long and the diameter of a fat pencil. He leans over and puts it smack in the middle of the forehead. When it’s done correctly it will kill the animal on the first shot.” So, one of the head auditors states that by default the animal is killed by the stunning, this meat is mayta, dead from an Islamic perspective

Labels: , ,

It's Time To Get GMO Soy Lecithin Out Of Certified Organic Food
Sunday, November 02, 2008

Time sensitive call to action. Deadline is Monday, November 3.

Lecithin is one of those mysterious, but common, ingredients found on the label of many packaged foods. It's an essential emulsifier that helps blend ingredients that don't naturally mix.

Due to the lack of adequate organic sources of soy lecithin, the USDA allowed the use of non-organic sources when it drafted the national organic standards in 2002. The Cornucopia Institute is alerting consumers and other organic stakeholders that it's time to tell the USDA to remove non-organic soy lecithin from the allowed ingredient list as reliable organic sources are now available. But, you have to act fast as the input deadline is Monday, November 3.

Click through for an explanation of the issue and details on how to have your voice heard.


Source: TreeHugger

Prop 7
Saturday, November 01, 2008

Proposition 7, if adopted by the people of California, will impose several new requirements to facilitate increase use of energy from renewable sources. One of key provisions of this proposition is that both private and government-owned utility companies to produce 20%, 40% and 50% of their electricity production by 2010, 2020, and 2025 respectively. The measure will also include the value and benefits of renewable resources as criteria to determine "Market Price of Electricity". The proposition also acknowledges that there will be potential increase in electricity rates for consumers by no more than 3%; however, there is no enforcement mechanism to prevent any electricity rate increase beyond 3%. (http://www.voterguide.sos.ca.gov/analysis/prop7-analysis.htm)



The measure will increase approximately $3.4 million in expenditure for administrative costs to the State, as the state will be responsible for granting energy permits, rather than municipalities. Consequently, there will be some saving in administrative costs at local-level. However, both the state and local governments will bare unknown fiscal effect, either positive or negative associated with potentially increased cost of electricity, as providers and/or users. (http://www.voterguide.sos.ca.gov/analysis/prop7-analysis.htm)



Something to keep in mind is that voting "no" does not mean that you do not care about the environment. The objective of this proposition – to increase use of renewable sources for California's energy production – is a legitimate problem to be addressed and considering that fossil fuel is scarce resource, many will agree that we should take proactive approach in replacing use of fossil fuel with more sustainable resources. However, that does not mean this is a good policy alternative to adopt.



The idea of achieving 50% of energy to be produced from renewable resources sounds good and may be a good goal to have. However, can we actually do it? Is it a realistic public policy? The existing law requires private energy providers to produce 20% of their energy from reusable resources by 2010, and this proposal will expand that scope significantly. We are not even sure if the existing goal is attainable or even making steady progress toward that goal, yet this proposition will impose another goals far beyond of what we have.



The current law is a product of the legislative process, where someone came up with the idea, then the idea was tested by evidences, expert opinions and public debate, and after many modifications and revisions, finally placed for a vote. As suppose to this ballot measure, or any other ballot initiatives alike, only asks you, the voters, to say "yes" or "no" on someone's idea, which may not be well developed public policy. Now, don't get me wrong that this idea is great and we indeed should be talking about this matter and finding solutions; however, as a matter of public policy, I do not think that this is a well-developed enough.



While some may feel that legislative process and government bureaucracy are just delaying progress toward sustainable community, bypassing the process with a sounding good proposal calls for "renewable energy" does not seem to be a right alternative. Again, the idea is great, but when you vote for Proposition 7, you are not just voting for this great idea. I believe that there has been too little conversation about how we achieve that goal, and to make a good public policy, we ought to have that conversation, rather than only talking about a final outcome.



Special Thanks to Guest Blogger: Hironao Okahana

MISSION STATEMENT

    Green Deen is a proactive effort of young Muslim activists from Southern California who have come together for the sake of Allah (swt) to raise awareness and change the current environmental conditions by promoting a healthier, greener and more environmentally conscious lifestyle.

ISLAMIC INSPIRATIONS

"And remember how He made you inheritors after the 'Ad people and gave you habitations in the land: ye build for yourselves palaces and castles in open plains, and carve out homes in mountains; so bring to remembrance the benefits ye have received from Allah, and refrain from evil and mischief on the Earth."

Al-Qur'an 7:74

CONTACT US

For comments, suggestions, information, and/or to share an article on Green Deen, please contact us at
socal.greendeen@gmail.com

LINK TO US

    Please feel free to link to us using any of the buttons below. Thank you for your support!

    Mini Button/Icon


    Large Icon

CREDITS

    Site designed by


    Powered by